I rescind my previous statements, this sounds like an objective opinion.
In theory, it could be if the tierlist was based entirely on numerical analysis and statistical performance modeling via Monte Carlo simulations, weighted by observed frequency of occurrence and criticality of success.
No it wouldn’t because the quest variables change.
“as long as her skills are at 10/10/10”
“if you’re okay with using plugsuit”
“if you have a Kaleidoscope”
“if you have a native Castoria to DCS”
“at NP2, otherwise”
“for this particular model battle”
even though she’s probably the better farming servant of the 3 imo
4th artoria buff when
7 and 1/2 years, no offensive or defensive utility
This year surely
Make Artoria Gain Avalon 2024
100% passive defense up let’s go
The GP tierlist has gotten inconsistent.
Your buff is the gacha. Grand Saber Artoria Alter.
TBF, it’s just Rabbit who thinks she is a C. The other reviewers have her on A le better and her final rating is A, which is perfectly fine.
So it’s not so much dissing her GP tier list placement than Rabbit’s evaluation of her.
I was cool to Ibuki before, as she doesn’t appear to be a stepwise upgrade over my Altera. Muramasa isn’t obviously better, either. Then 2023(24?) discussion around Morgan as a DKSO Buster omni-looper, makes me even less inclined to pull for her or Muramasa.
tl;dr, I’m saving my SQ for DKSO and throwing what I can spare toward Morgan as her banners come up.